Acto. Stage 2

Mitos
Pistas: –
Debéis encontrar un camino de vuelta a casa. Si los yithianos pueden traeros a este lugar, seguramente debe de haber una forma de regresar…

Objetivo - Si tres de las siguientes afirmaciones son ciertas, debes hacer avanzar el acto:

- Un investigador ha "encontrado el proceso".

- Un investigador ha "diseccionado un órgano".

- Un investigador ha "interrogado a un sujeto de pruebas".

- Un investigador ha "averiguado qué año es".

- Un investigador ha "activado el dispositivo".

- Un investigador controla El custodio.

Stephen Somers
La Ciudad de los Archivos #242. La Ciudad de los Archivos #6.

El proceso - Reverso

Acto
Creéis haber descubierto el proceso que emplean los yithianos para transportaros aquí. Pero la verdad es difícil de aceptar. Nunca trajeron vuestros cuerpos a este lugar. Vuestra mente ha sido transferida al cuerpo de una de estas criaturas. En alguna parte, y en otro tiempo, una de las denostadas criaturas habita en cada uno de vuestros cuerpos.

Ya no tienes que realizar ninguna de las siguientes tareas. Sin embargo, cuantas más hayas realizado para cuando acabe el escenario, más fácil será la transición a tu cuerpo humano, y menos probable será el proceso falle o salga mal. Cuidado…

Coloca este acto en la zona de victoria con este lado boca arriba como recordatorio.

- Un investigador ha "encontrado el proceso".

- Un investigador ha "diseccionado un órgano".

- Un investigador ha "interrogado a un sujeto de pruebas".

- Un investigador ha "averiguado qué año es".

- Un investigador ha "activado el dispositivo".

- Un investigador controla El custodio.

Acceso restringido
Acceso restringido

FAQs

No faqs yet for this card.

Reviews

This is a question as opposed to a review: suppose an investigator controlled the custodian and then lost control of it in Act 3a. Then for the purpose of Act 2b (and the scenario resolution), is it true that the investigator "has performed" the "An investigator controls the Custodian?"

To be clear, I think this is different from Act 2a, where it states "if three of the following are true..." and when you lose control, it is no longer true that you "have control". However, given the way the game resolves the number of tasks in the resolution of the scenario, it seems it expects the number of tasks you have "performed by the time the scenario ends" (as opposed to, say "to be true by the time the scenario ends") to be definitely between 3 and 6, and you can get into a state where you only have 2 tasks (by doing the Custodian and 2 other tasks, then losing the custodian), which is not given a consequence in the resolution.

krzhang · 7
You'd have to control the custodian at time of resolution; the text isn't in quotes so it's not asking you to remember something, it's just looking at the game state. It should say, roughly, "the more of the following that are true, the better..." but it seems to have slipped under QA's nets. — SGPrometheus · 797
I agree with SGPrometheus; you need control when all payers reach the “resign” condition. — LivefromBenefitSt · 1050
That seems to be right to me as well but like the OP said , it does create a new hole in the rules in the resolution. If you advance from Act 2a to 2b with control of the Custodian and two other things , lose control of the Custodian in Act 3 and don't complete any other tasks by the time you resign then you end up with 2 tasks completed in the resolution and no instructions for what to do. And yeah, I also kinda think that suggests the intent was for it not to be possible to "un-do" the tasks....Might be worth asking over — bee123 · 31
I'd just go for the 3 tasks completed bullet; it doesn't get much worse than that anyway :p — SGPrometheus · 797
hehe I do agree with that! I still hold that if we are going to take cards to their word though, we would incentivize minmax players to go for the 2 tasks instead of the 3 to dodge a ‘ — krzhang · 7
(argh misclick) “better” outcome, so an errata would be nice. — krzhang · 7